On 2025-03-11 16:13, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 11/03/2025 13:46, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Is it okay to backport below patch and r15-7890-gb7f5d911480 to
releases/gcc-14?
Yes, sure.
Pushed as r14.2.0-877-gf1dd3a17cf3 and r14.2.0-878-gde08b13018a.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
R.
Kind reg
Is it okay to backport below patch and r15-7890-gb7f5d911480 to releases/gcc-14?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2025-03-11 12:06, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
GCC will complain if the -mcpu flag specifies a different architecture
to that specified in -march, but if the floating-point ABI is "soft",
then
On 11/03/2025 13:46, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Is it okay to backport below patch and r15-7890-gb7f5d911480 to
releases/gcc-14?
Yes, sure.
R.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2025-03-11 12:06, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
GCC will complain if the -mcpu flag specifies a different architecture
to that s
GCC will complain if the -mcpu flag specifies a different architecture
to that specified in -march, but if the floating-point ABI is "soft",
then differences in the floating-point architecture features are
ignored.
However, the arm_libc_fp_abi checks whether we change the FP ABI by
adding -mfloat-
