On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2023-10-20T12:51:03+0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > I've committed this patch
>
> ... as commit c7ec7bd1c6590cf4eed267feab490288e0b8d691
> "amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL", which the later RDNA3/gfx1100
> support builds on top of,
Hi!
On 2023-10-20T12:51:03+0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> I've committed this patch
... as commit c7ec7bd1c6590cf4eed267feab490288e0b8d691
"amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL", which the later RDNA3/gfx1100
support builds on top of, and that's what I'm currently working on
getting proper GCC/
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2023-10-20T12:51:03+0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > I've committed this patch
>
> ... as commit c7ec7bd1c6590cf4eed267feab490288e0b8d691
> "amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL".
>
> The RDNA2 ISA variant doesn't support certain instru
Hi!
On 2023-10-20T12:51:03+0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> I've committed this patch
... as commit c7ec7bd1c6590cf4eed267feab490288e0b8d691
"amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL".
The RDNA2 ISA variant doesn't support certain instructions previous
implemented in GCC/GCN, so a number of patterns
On 20/10/2023 12:51, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
I've committed this patch that allows building binaries for AMD gfx1030
GPUs. I can't actually test it, however, so somebody else will have to
debug it (or wait for me to get my hands on a device). Richi reports
that it does not execute correctly, as is
I've committed this patch that allows building binaries for AMD gfx1030
GPUs. I can't actually test it, however, so somebody else will have to
debug it (or wait for me to get my hands on a device). Richi reports
that it does not execute correctly, as is.
This is an experimental broken feature,
