> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:33 PM
> To: Moore, Catherine
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [committed] PR 51931: force non-MIPS16ness for long-branch tests
> (NOW RF
Sorry for the late reply. Been thinking it over a bit more.
"Moore, Catherine" writes:
> Now that we are in the window for 4.8, I'd like to discuss the
> possibility of applying this patch. Have you had a chance to think
> about it?
In the end, I think we should go for the fix originally sugge
y, February 06, 2012 2:51 PM
> To: Moore, Catherine
> Cc: Tang, Chung-Lin; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [committed] PR 51931: force non-MIPS16ness for long-branch tests
> (NOW RFA: MIPS16 Long Branch Patch)
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> "Moore, Catherine" w
Catherine
>> Subject: Re: [committed] PR 51931: force non-MIPS16ness for long-branch tests
>>
>> On 2012/1/22 06:33 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > The MIPS16 port has never handled long branches properly; see PR 51931
>> > for the details. It isn't easy to
> -Original Message-
> From: Chung-Lin Tang [mailto:clt...@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:36 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rdsandif...@googlemail.com
> Cc: Moore, Catherine
> Subject: Re: [committed] PR 51931: force non-MIPS16ness for long-br
On 2012/1/22 06:33 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> The MIPS16 port has never handled long branches properly; see PR 51931
> for the details. It isn't easy to xfail MIPS16-specific problems at
> the dejagnu level because of -mflip-mips16, so the patch below forces
> a nomips16 attribute instead.
>
The MIPS16 port has never handled long branches properly; see PR 51931
for the details. It isn't easy to xfail MIPS16-specific problems at
the dejagnu level because of -mflip-mips16, so the patch below forces
a nomips16 attribute instead.
Tested on mips64-linux-gnu and applied.
Richard
gcc/tes
