Richard Sandiford writes:
> this patch makes -fno-delayed-branch imply -Wa,-O1. It also makes
> sure that we explicitly assemble with -O0 by default.
Um, I meant -O1. The point is that -Wa,-O0 vs -Wa,-O1 isn't really an
optimization decision; -O0 just inserts nops that weren't even implied
by t
Following the discussion here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00216.html
this patch makes -fno-delayed-branch imply -Wa,-O1. It also makes
sure that we explicitly assemble with -O0 by default. (Previously,
we'd assemble with -O0 if the user specified -O0, but assemble with
the default
