On 08/05/12 22:42, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw writes:
>> FTR, this caused
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
>
> Well, this really has been a brown-paper-bag patch. Fixed as below.
> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and applied as obvious.
>
> Richard
>
>
> gcc/
>
Richard Earnshaw writes:
> FTR, this caused
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
Well, this really has been a brown-paper-bag patch. Fixed as below.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and applied as obvious.
Richard
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/53278
* lower-subreg.c (decom
On 06/05/12 19:55, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>> TARGET_RTX_COSTS gets called with x = (const_int 1) and outer = SET
>> for example. How do I get SET_DEST from that information?
>>
>> I don't now if lower-subreg.s ever emits such cost requests, but several
>> passes defini
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> TARGET_RTX_COSTS gets called with x = (const_int 1) and outer = SET
> for example. How do I get SET_DEST from that information?
>
> I don't now if lower-subreg.s ever emits such cost requests, but several
> passes definitely do.
Gah! I really should have remembered tha
