On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 12:38 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 23:10 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > The patch you sent, as well as what you committed as r10-7383,
> > was just a ChangeLog entry.
> >
> > > Bootstrapped
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 23:10 -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> The patch you sent, as well as what you committed as r10-7383,
> was just a ChangeLog entry.
>
> > Bootstrapped on sh4-linux-gnu and sh4eb-linux-gnu. Regression testing in
> >
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
The patch you sent, as well as what you committed as r10-7383,
was just a ChangeLog entry.
> Bootstrapped on sh4-linux-gnu and sh4eb-linux-gnu. Regression testing in
> progress (won't finish for ~12 hours). No new test as it's covered by vect
Whee, more fallout from the pr90275 changes. Thankfully this time it's a target
issue.
The sh4/sh4eb ports are failing vector-compare-1 execution tests after the cse
changes. They only run once a week, so this wasn't caught immediately and took
some time to reproduce and analyze.
Ultimately th
