On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
>> In file included from
>> /scratch/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/gcc/unique-ptr-tests.cc:23:
>> In file included from
>> /scratch/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/gcc/../include/unique-ptr.h:77:
>> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:629:
>> /usr/include/c++/v1/t
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 19:23 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
> > For reference, here's what I committed:
>
> I'm afraid this may have broken the bootstrap with clang?
>
> In file included from /scratch/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/gcc/unique-ptr-
> tests.cc:23:
> In
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
> For reference, here's what I committed:
I'm afraid this may have broken the bootstrap with clang?
In file included from /scratch/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/gcc/unique-ptr-tests.cc:23:
In file included from
/scratch/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/gcc/../include/unique-pt
From: Trevor Saunders
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 11:47 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/14/2017 12:35 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > As far as I can tell from your mail, the one issue that blocks that
> > is the lack of gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr.
> >
> > So here's an patch on top of the previous one
