Re: [committed][nvptx] Split up function ref plus const

2020-10-09 Thread Tom de Vries
On 10/9/20 11:03 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi Tom! > > On 2020-09-23T22:46:34+0200, Tom de Vries wrote: >> With test-case gcc.c-torture/compile/pr92231.c, we run into: > > "Interesting" testcase... ;-) > >> ... >> nvptx-as: ptxas terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped^M

Re: [committed][nvptx] Split up function ref plus const

2020-10-09 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Tom! On 2020-09-23T22:46:34+0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > With test-case gcc.c-torture/compile/pr92231.c, we run into: "Interesting" testcase... ;-) > ... > nvptx-as: ptxas terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped^M Confirmed with: $ ptxas --version ptxas: NVIDIA

[committed][nvptx] Split up function ref plus const

2020-09-23 Thread Tom de Vries
Hi, With test-case gcc.c-torture/compile/pr92231.c, we run into: ... nvptx-as: ptxas terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped^M compiler exited with status 1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr92231.c -O0 (test for excess errors) ... due to using a function reference plus constant