On 06/23/2015 07:12 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
While looking at something else I noticed that we're using == for
INTEGER_CSTs comparison. That isn't going to work well, so use
tree_int_cst_equal instead. Because of that we weren't diagnosing
the following test.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-l
While looking at something else I noticed that we're using == for
INTEGER_CSTs comparison. That isn't going to work well, so use
tree_int_cst_equal instead. Because of that we weren't diagnosing
the following test.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-06-23 Marek Polacek
