On Thu, 2013-08-08 10:43:53 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 16:36 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > This break Ada.
> >
> > Fixed thusly, bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied.
>
> Thanks; sorry again about the breakage.
Build Robot (http://toolchain.lug-o
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 16:36 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > This break Ada.
>
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied.
Thanks; sorry again about the breakage.
> This break Ada.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied.
2013-08-08 Eric Botcazou
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (TOOLS_LIBS): Pick C object files from the
compiler build and use standard library variables.
(../../vxaddr2line$(exeext): Do
> Sorry. How does the attached look? (am bootstrapping now)
Thanks for devising the patch. However, we are in the process of fixing the
issue on the Ada side so please do not apply it for now.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 09:01 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> David Malcolm writes:
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/coretypes.h b/gcc/coretypes.h
> > index edb9c8c..54bfe7f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/coretypes.h
> > +++ b/gcc/coretypes.h
> > @@ -169,6 +169,12 @@ typedef const struct basic_block_def
> > *const_bas
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 15:25 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Looks good, please install if not already done.
Thanks; I've now committed this to trunk as r201569.
> I think it's r201508, but in any case, I'm attaching a patch which fixes
> this build error. Only very lightly tested so far, with configure
> --target=sparc-linux with build&host x86_64. Was able to build a cc1
> and step through the changed code in the debugger, though am getting
> "cc1: erro
David Malcolm writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/coretypes.h b/gcc/coretypes.h
> index edb9c8c..54bfe7f 100644
> --- a/gcc/coretypes.h
> +++ b/gcc/coretypes.h
> @@ -169,6 +169,12 @@ typedef const struct basic_block_def *const_basic_block;
> in target.h. */
> typedef int reg_class_t;
>
> +class rt
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:53 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Go for it. The static "212" is not required as long as the pass shows
> up in the right spot in the pass sequence.
Thanks. I checked, and both with and without the hardcoded 212, the
dumpfile for the pass for a foo.c is currently:
foo.c.246
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 12:49 -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 11:23 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > gcc/
> > * coretypes.h (rtl_opt_pass): Add.
> > (gcc::context): Add.
> > * config/epiphany/epiphany.c (pass_mode_switch_use): New.
> > (
Go for it. The static "212" is not required as long as the pass shows
up in the right spot in the pass sequence.
On 08/06/2013 11:23 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> gcc/
> * coretypes.h (rtl_opt_pass): Add.
> (gcc::context): Add.
> * config/epiphany/epiphany.c (pass_mode_switch_use): New.
> (epiphany_init): Port to new C++ pass API.
> (epiphany_optimize_mode_switching): Likewise.
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 10:34 -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 06:06 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Index: gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h
> > ===
> > --- gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h (revision 201526)
> > +++ gcc/config/e
On 08/06/2013 06:06 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Index: gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h
> ===
> --- gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h(revision 201526)
> +++ gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h(working copy)
> @@ -929,6 +929,9 @@
> };
>
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:12 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 14:10:11 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
> > And probably also for sparc{,64}-linux:
> >
> > g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
> > -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wa
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:18 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 13:12:57 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
> > wrote:
> > > New Revision: 201508
> > >
> > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201508&root=gcc&view=rev
On Tue, 2013-08-06 12:06:24 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:12 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
> > wrote:
[Breakage on epiphany-elf]
> I'm kicking off a bootstrap of this (on x86_64) to further verify that
> the
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 12:06 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:12 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
> > wrote:
> > > New Revision: 201508
> > >
> > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201508&root=gcc&view=rev
> > > L
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:12 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> > New Revision: 201508
> >
> > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201508&root=gcc&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Automated conversion of passes to C++ classes
> >
> > gcc/
>
On Tue, 2013-08-06 14:10:11 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> And probably also for sparc{,64}-linux:
>
> g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
> -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
> -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribu
On Tue, 2013-08-06 13:18:16 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 13:12:57 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
> > wrote:
> > > New Revision: 201508
> > >
> > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201508&root=gcc&view=re
On Tue, 2013-08-06 13:12:57 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> > New Revision: 201508
> >
> > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201508&root=gcc&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Automated conversion of passes to C++ classes
> >
> > gcc/
>
On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
> New Revision: 201508
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201508&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> Automated conversion of passes to C++ classes
>
> gcc/
>
> Patch autogenerated by refactor_passes.py from
> https://github
23 matches
Mail list logo
