Thanks Christophe for reporting the errors.
On 9/16/20, 7:45 AM, "Kyrylo Tkachov" wrote:
> > The new tests vld1x3 and vld1x4 fail on arm, I am seeing new failures
> > on gcc-8 and gcc-9 branches
> > after r8-10451, r8-10452 and r9-8874.
> > Is that expected/fixed later in the backport series?
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Christophe Lyon
> Sent: 16 September 2020 13:43
> To: Pop, Sebastian
> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 07:21, Pop, Sebastian
self-contained we haven't had any bugs
> reported against these in my recollection.
>
> So ok on the grounds that it's a bug-fix.
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
> From: Pop, Sebastian
> Sent: 11 September 2020 20:54
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.or
rill
From: Pop, Sebastian
Sent: 11 September 2020 20:54
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov
Subject: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8
Hi,
gcc-8 branch is missing NEON intrinsics for loads and stores.
Attached patches pass bootstrap and regression
't had any bugs reported
against these in my recollection.
So ok on the grounds that it's a bug-fix.
Thanks,
Kyrill
From: Pop, Sebastian
Sent: 11 September 2020 20:54
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Kyrylo Tkachov
Subject: [aarch64] Backport missing NEON intrinsics to GCC8
Hi,
gcc-8 br
Hi,
gcc-8 branch is missing NEON intrinsics for loads and stores.
Attached patches pass bootstrap and regression testing on Graviton2
aarch64-linux.
Ok to commit to gcc-8 branch?
Thanks,
Sebastian
0001-Patch-implementing-vld1_-_x3-vst1_-_x2-and-vst1_-_x3.patch
Description: 0001-Patch-implemen
