Re: [VMS/committed]: Do not define __size_t on VMS

2012-03-12 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Mar 9, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: > >> as it is already defined and used by the system headers. >> >> No regressions for x86_64-darwin after full bootstrap. >> >> Tristan. >> >> 2012-03-09 Tristan Gingold >> >> * ginclude/

Re: [VMS/committed]: Do not define __size_t on VMS

2012-03-09 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: > as it is already defined and used by the system headers. > > No regressions for x86_64-darwin after full bootstrap. > > Tristan. > > 2012-03-09 Tristan Gingold > > * ginclude/stddef.h: Do not define __size_t on VMS. Sorry, this patch is wr

[VMS/committed]: Do not define __size_t on VMS

2012-03-09 Thread Tristan Gingold
as it is already defined and used by the system headers. No regressions for x86_64-darwin after full bootstrap. Tristan. 2012-03-09 Tristan Gingold * ginclude/stddef.h: Do not define __size_t on VMS. diff --git a/gcc/ginclude/stddef.h b/gcc/ginclude/stddef.h index 8a03948e..ebe0190