> On Mar 27, 2023, at 12:48 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mar 27, 2023, at 12:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 04:22:25PM +, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
The latter IMHO. Having a warning with completely nonsensical name will
> On Mar 27, 2023, at 12:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 04:22:25PM +, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> The latter IMHO. Having a warning with completely nonsensical name will
>>> just confuse users.
>>
>> Okay. -:)
>> How about "-Wstruct-with-fam-not-at-end”?
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 04:22:25PM +, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > The latter IMHO. Having a warning with completely nonsensical name will
> > just confuse users.
>
> Okay. -:)
> How about "-Wstruct-with-fam-not-at-end”? Or do you have any suggestion on
> the name?
Nobody will know
> On Mar 27, 2023, at 12:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:57:58PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
+Please use warning option @option{-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end}
to
>>> This is certainly misnamed.
>>
>> The name “-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end” was
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:57:58PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >> +Please use warning option @option{-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end}
> >> to
> > This is certainly misnamed.
>
> The name “-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end” was just used the warning
> name from CLANG. -:)
>
> Shall we use
> On Mar 27, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:38:34PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2023, at 4:14 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>
+Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end
+C
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:38:34PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 23, 2023, at 4:14 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> >> +Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end
> >> +C C++ Var(warn_variable_sized_type_not_at_end) Warning
> >> +War
> On Mar 27, 2023, at 10:34 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-03-27 at 13:38 +, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2023, at 4:14 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>
+Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end
>>
On Mon, 2023-03-27 at 13:38 +, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 23, 2023, at 4:14 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > > +Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end
> > > +C C++ Var(warn_variable_sized_type_not_at_end) Warnin
> On Mar 23, 2023, at 4:14 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> +Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end
>> +C C++ Var(warn_variable_sized_type_not_at_end) Warning
>> +Warn about structures or unions with C99 flexible array members are not
>> +at
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> +Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end
> +C C++ Var(warn_variable_sized_type_not_at_end) Warning
> +Warn about structures or unions with C99 flexible array members are not
> +at the end of a structure.
I think there's at least one word missing
Ping…
Please let me know if you have any further comments on the patch.
thanks.
Qing
Begin forwarded message:
From: Qing Zhao mailto:qing.z...@oracle.com>>
Subject: [V5][PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to clarify a GCC extension
Date: March 16, 2023 at 5:47:15 PM EDT
T
on a structure with a C99 flexible array member being nested in
another structure. (PR77650)
"GCC extension accepts a structure containing an ISO C99 "flexible array
member", or a union containing such a structure (possibly recursively)
to be a member of a structure.
There are two situations:
13 matches
Mail list logo
