> It's the new slot sharing code that doesn't have support for saving
> larger hunks. Having written the original code to handle larger saves
> specifically to help sparc, I can certainly understand why the new code
> is causing you grief :-)
Thanks for the historical perspective. :-)
> No objec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/24/11 16:30, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> The new save slot sharing algorithm has a documented limitation:
>
>Future work:
>
> In the fallback case we should iterate backwards across all possible
> modes for the save, choosing the large
The new save slot sharing algorithm has a documented limitation:
Future work:
In the fallback case we should iterate backwards across all possible
modes for the save, choosing the largest available one instead of
falling back to the smallest mode immediately. (eg TF -> DF -> SF
