Oleg Endo wrote:
> This adds support for the SH2A instructions movu.b and movu.w for
> zero-extending mem loads with displacement addressing.
> Tested on rev 190332 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
>
> and no
Hello,
This adds support for the SH2A instructions movu.b and movu.w for
zero-extending mem loads with displacement addressing.
Tested on rev 190332 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
and no new failures.
OK?
Chee
Oleg Endo wrote:
> This patch fixes a minor issue related to the displacement addressing
> patterns, which leads to useless movt exts.* sequences and one of the
> predicates wrongly accepting non-mem ops.
>
> Tested on rev 190151 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-
Hello,
This patch fixes a minor issue related to the displacement addressing
patterns, which leads to useless movt exts.* sequences and one of the
predicates wrongly accepting non-mem ops.
Tested on rev 190151 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch adds some more test cases for PR 50751.
>
> Tested on sh-sim with
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp=pr50751* --target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4-single/-ml,
> -m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
>
> to confirm that
Hi,
The attached patch adds some more test cases for PR 50751.
Tested on sh-sim with
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp=pr50751* --target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4-single/-ml,
-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
to confirm that the tests pass as expected.
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 22:10 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> >> BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
> >>
> >
> > Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> > Not so spectacular :T
> > I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something went
> > r
Oleg Endo wrote:
>> BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
>>
>
> Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> Not so spectacular :T
> I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something went
> really bad. It's a bit difficult to isolate the degradations because
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 07:14 -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > > BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
> >
> > Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> > Not so spectacular :T
> > I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something we
- Original Message -
> > BTW, do you have the numbers of CSiBE with this?
>
> Only for "-m4-single -ml -O2 -mpretend-cmove" so far.
> Not so spectacular :T
> I'll also do a comparison of more variants to see if something went
> really bad. It's a bit difficult to isolate the degradations
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 22:42 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> > The attached patch adds HImode addressing support.
> > Tested against rev. 186243 with
> > sudo make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
> > -m4-sing
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch adds HImode addressing support.
> Tested against rev. 186243 with
> sudo make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
> -m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
>
> and
Hello,
The attached patch adds HImode addressing support.
Tested against rev. 186243 with
sudo make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
-m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
and no new failures.
Test ca
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch generalizes the move insn displacement calculations a
> little bit. Before, the same address rebasing code was present in
> sh_legitimize_address as well as sh_legitimize_reload_address. I've
> pulled those out into a separate function as a preparation step
Hi,
The attached patch generalizes the move insn displacement calculations a
little bit. Before, the same address rebasing code was present in
sh_legitimize_address as well as sh_legitimize_reload_address. I've
pulled those out into a separate function as a preparation step for
adding HImode dis
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch adds some test cases for PR 50751 to check whether
> mov.b insns are generated.
OK.
Regards,
kaz
Hi,
The attached patch adds some test cases for PR 50751 to check whether
mov.b insns are generated.
Tested on sh-sim with
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp=pr50751* --target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4-single/-ml,
-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
to con
Oleg Endo wrote:
> This is an updated version of the QImode displacement addressing patch
> from the PR that applies to rev 185405. Tested on sh-sim with no new
> failures.
>
> The issue as a whole requires some more work and I'd like to split it in
> smaller incremental changes and separate pat
Hi,
This is an updated version of the QImode displacement addressing patch
from the PR that applies to rev 185405. Tested on sh-sim with no new
failures.
The issue as a whole requires some more work and I'd like to split it in
smaller incremental changes and separate patches.
Cheers,
Oleg
Cha
19 matches
Mail list logo
