On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 23:46 +0100, Oleg Endo wrote:
> I will install this the patch from
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg01743.html
> in 24h if there are no further objections.
>
The above mentioned patch has been committed as r220081. This is a
small follow up patch that fixes
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 01:51 +0100, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 20:05 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> > Oleg Endo wrote:
> > > The updated treg_set_expr patch is attached, which should fix the GBR
> > > issues. Tests here OK.
> > > Kaz, could you please try again?
> >
> > New tests that F
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 20:05 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> > The updated treg_set_expr patch is attached, which should fix the GBR
> > issues. Tests here OK.
> > Kaz, could you please try again?
>
> New tests that FAIL:
>
> libgomp.fortran/udr14.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler e
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The updated treg_set_expr patch is attached, which should fix the GBR
> issues. Tests here OK.
> Kaz, could you please try again?
New tests that FAIL:
libgomp.fortran/udr14.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
libgomp.fortran/udr14.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
O
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 13:25 +0100, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 22:40 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> > Oleg Endo wrote:
> > > Kaz, could you please test the patch on your sh4-linux setup and report
> > > your findings? Even though it's a bit late, I'd like to get this in for
> > > GCC 5,
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 13:25 +0100, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 22:40 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> > Oleg Endo wrote:
> > > Kaz, could you please test the patch on your sh4-linux setup and report
> > > your findings? Even though it's a bit late, I'd like to get this in for
> > > GCC 5,
On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 22:40 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Oleg Endo wrote:
> > Kaz, could you please test the patch on your sh4-linux setup and report
> > your findings? Even though it's a bit late, I'd like to get this in for
> > GCC 5, if it doesn't break too many things.
>
> Looks wrong code pro
Oleg Endo wrote:
> Kaz, could you please test the patch on your sh4-linux setup and report
> your findings? Even though it's a bit late, I'd like to get this in for
> GCC 5, if it doesn't break too many things.
Looks wrong code problem for tls and atomic constructs.
Here is the result of compare
Hi,
The attached patch does a couple of things, which are based on the
treg_set_expr (for an explanation/motivation see below). Somehow the
stuff just kept piling on and it was difficult to make step-by-step
patches for all the individual issues. Some patterns needed to be
rewritten to keep the
