Oleg Endo wrote:
> This time with the right patch attached. Sorry.
>
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 21:09 +0200, Oleg Endo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The attached patch is a fix for PR 53886, as suggested in the PR.
>> I've also replaced another unchecked usage of 'PATTERN (NEXT_INSN
>> (PREV_INSN (insn))
This time with the right patch attached. Sorry.
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 21:09 +0200, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch is a fix for PR 53886, as suggested in the PR.
> I've also replaced another unchecked usage of 'PATTERN (NEXT_INSN
> (PREV_INSN (insn)))' in 'find_barrier', just in
Hello,
The attached patch is a fix for PR 53886, as suggested in the PR.
I've also replaced another unchecked usage of 'PATTERN (NEXT_INSN
(PREV_INSN (insn)))' in 'find_barrier', just in case.
Tested on rev 189361 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-