On Mon, 2024-10-14 at 11:37 +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
> For memory loads/stores (that contain a MEM rtx) sh_rtx_costs would wrongly
> report a cost lower than 1 insn which is not accurate as it makes
> loads/stores appear cheaper than simple arithmetic insns. The cost of a
> load/store insn is at le
For memory loads/stores (that contain a MEM rtx) sh_rtx_costs would wrongly
report a cost lower than 1 insn which is not accurate as it makes
loads/stores appear cheaper than simple arithmetic insns. The cost of a
load/store insn is at least 1 insn plus the cost of the address expression
(some add
