Re: [RFT][patch] Fix PR testsuite/48498

2011-05-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Ira Rosen wrote: > > > gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 20/04/2011 02:24:55 PM: > >> >> Hi, >> >> In gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c and gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr29145.c vectorization is >> expected to fail on targets vect_no_align. But no realignment is > necessary >> here e

Re: [RFT][patch] Fix PR testsuite/48498

2011-05-01 Thread Ira Rosen
gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 20/04/2011 02:24:55 PM: > > Hi, > > In gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c and gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr29145.c vectorization is > expected to fail on targets vect_no_align. But no realignment is necessary > here except for having the array bases aligned. This patch removes xf

[RFT][patch] Fix PR testsuite/48498

2011-04-20 Thread Ira Rosen
Hi, In gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c and gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-pr29145.c vectorization is expected to fail on targets vect_no_align. But no realignment is necessary here except for having the array bases aligned. This patch removes xfail for vect_no_align (and increases a loop bound in slp-3.c to prevent comp