On 4/25/23 03:53, Kito Cheng wrote:
I am not sure if we should accept this on gcc trunk without binutils support?
Let's get the binutils bits in first. I don't mind owning that review.
It just hasn't been a priority due to the gcc-13 freeze.
jeff
I am ok if binutils patch get merged into trunk
Philipp Tomsich 於 2023年4月25日 週二 18:15 寫道：
> The binutils support is lingering on-list since Jan 2022:
>https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-January/119388.html
>
> If we get an OK on that one, we will rebase, retest, and merge it.
>
>
The binutils support is lingering on-list since Jan 2022:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-January/119388.html
If we get an OK on that one, we will rebase, retest, and merge it.
Thanks,
Philipp.
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 11:53, Kito Cheng wrote:
> I am not sure if we should accep
I am not sure if we should accept this on gcc trunk without binutils support?
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 3:58 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/10/23 15:41, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> > This adds the xventanacondops extension to the option parsing and as a
> > default for the ventana-vt1
On 2/10/23 15:41, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
This adds the xventanacondops extension to the option parsing and as a
default for the ventana-vt1 core:
gcc/Changelog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: Recognize
"xventanacondops" as part of an architecture string.
*
This adds the xventanacondops extension to the option parsing and as a
default for the ventana-vt1 core:
gcc/Changelog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: Recognize
"xventanacondops" as part of an architecture string.
* config/riscv/riscv-opts.h (MASK_XVENTANACONDOPS
