>> It would be nice to have a small test case for this problem with
>> compiler options to reproduce it.
>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation. The original issue has found
> with the older sh-lra branch which was based on trunk at this September.
> Now I've found that the original test case in
Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> * lra.c (lra_update_insn_regno_info): Take account of arguments
>> via memory which could be implicit usage of pseudo regs.
>>
>
> It could be a solution but I believe the problem should be solved in
> some other way. The patch will generate a correct code bu
On 2014-12-17 7:57 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
This patch is discussed in PR55212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c48
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c49
and is to avoid segfault in remove_pseudos.
In the pro
This patch is discussed in PR55212
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c48
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212#c49
and is to avoid segfault in remove_pseudos.
In the problematic case in #c47, a call_insn has a no
