> > That's a good point, but ISA_SPEC_CLASS_FROZEN_2021 is hard to
> > reference to which spec, so I would prefer to add a -misa-spec=2021 to
> > align platform/profile spec, and then ISA_SPEC_CLASS_2021, and before
> > RISC-V platform/profile spec has released, let keep
> > ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE :p
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:48 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph:
>
> > I think this needs another specification class (there is a
> > specification for the instructions and it is in public review).
> > Proposal: ISA_SPEC_CLASS_FROZEN_2021
>
> That's a good point, but ISA_SPEC_CLASS_FROZEN_2021
Hi Christoph:
> I think this needs another specification class (there is a
> specification for the instructions and it is in public review).
> Proposal: ISA_SPEC_CLASS_FROZEN_2021
That's a good point, but ISA_SPEC_CLASS_FROZEN_2021 is hard to
reference to which spec, so I would prefer to add a -m
Hi Kito,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 9:57 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> 2021-09-23 Kito Cheng
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.c (riscv_ext_version_table):
> Add zba, zbb, zbc and zbs.
> (riscv_ext_flag_table): Ditto.
> * config/riscv/riscv-opts.
2021-09-23 Kito Cheng
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.c (riscv_ext_version_table):
Add zba, zbb, zbc and zbs.
(riscv_ext_flag_table): Ditto.
* config/riscv/riscv-opts.h (MASK_ZBA): New.
(MASK_ZBB): Ditto.
(MASK_ZBC): Ditto.
