Hi Eli,
Yeah sorry I forgot to tag with -v2, so I am creating a -v3, after a while that
I do not use email to send patches I get a little bit rusty.
Thanks for your useful feedback, I am sending the v3 now.
Cheers,
Vincent.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:19 PM Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
> On 1/31/
On 1/31/24 4:43 PM, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote:
> This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in
> Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems
> from the recognized need within our community for a more
> streamlined and efficient development process when using Nix.
>
> Please not tha
This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in
Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems
from the recognized need within our community for a more
streamlined and efficient development process when using Nix.
Please not that in this case the Nix tool is used to define
what shoul
Hi all,
>Are you backing down from that opinion and deciding that this proposal
is, indeed, after all specific to NixOS and only NixOS and is neither
needed nor used on any other distro?
I may be misreading the conversation, so let's restart it.
Why should my RFC be inside the distro's repositor
On 12/5/23 5:35 AM, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote:
>>> I see, but to me, this do not look like a distro build procedure,
>>> because you can use
>>> with any kind of system (OSX/UNIX) by using nix.
>>
>> But you can do the same with various other distro build procedures too?
>> e.g. Gentoo Prefix allows y
Hi all,
>Generally we have various stuff in contrib/, one of it scripts like
gcc_build. IMHO the flake.nix file (or a script to create it) could be
put there as well.
I was not sure about that, I will try to see what if I can put in there
>But you can do the same with various other distro buil
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:26 AM Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
> On 12/4/23 9:01 PM, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >> Distro build procedures are not something the GCC project generally gets
> >> involved with.
> >
> > I see, but to me, this do not look like a
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 4:58 PM Vincenzo Palazzo
wrote:
>
> This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in
> Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems
> from the recognized need within our community for a more
> streamlined and efficient development process when using Nix.
I th
Ciao all,
>+1. I think this is best left to the distros.
What do you mean? this is not a package, it is an env shell in order
to build an work on GCC on NixOS.
NixOS has already the packages for GCC
Cheers,
Vincent.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/4/23 18:02,
On 12/4/23 18:02, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 4:58 PM Vincenzo Palazzo
wrote:
This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in
Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems
from the recognized need within our community for a more
streamlined and efficient devel
This commit is specifically targeting enhancements in
Nix support for GCC development. This initiative stems
from the recognized need within our community for a more
streamlined and efficient development process when using Nix.
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo
---
flake.lock | 60
On 12/4/23 18:38, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote:
Ciao all,
+1. I think this is best left to the distros.
What do you mean? this is not a package, it is an env shell in order
to build an work on GCC on NixOS.
Distro build procedures are not something the GCC project generally gets
involved with
On 12/4/23 9:01 PM, Vincenzo Palazzo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>> Distro build procedures are not something the GCC project generally gets
>> involved with.
>
> I see, but to me, this do not look like a distro build procedure,
> because you can use
> with any kind of
>Distro build procedures are not something the GCC project generally gets
involved with.
I see, but to me, this do not look like a distro build procedure,
because you can use
with any kind of system (OSX/UNIX) by using nix.
I disagree with you just because my patch is not building a package
but i
However, I understand your point.
Cheers,
Vincent.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:01 AM Vincenzo Palazzo
wrote:
>
> >Distro build procedures are not something the GCC project generally gets
> involved with.
>
> I see, but to me, this do not look like a distro build procedure,
> because you can use
15 matches
Mail list logo
