Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-31 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > I made a quick comparison of the libtool.m4 in libgo/config with the > 2.4.2 version: the only relevant change seems to be an instance of > AC_PROG_GO, which also lives in go.m4. Ian will know why that > additional copy is necessary. The version of AC_PROG_GO in libgo/conf

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-31 Thread Rainer Orth
Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > It's a pretty big update as you can see by the following diffstat. I > cannot attach

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-29 Thread Andi Kleen
> I haven't figured out yet how to use gcc-ar et al. instead of the shell > wrappers. The plugin path seems to be hardcoded, which is unfortunate. > Would it be possible to make the wrappers more flexible, so that they > could be used during bootstrap? The path can be set with GCC_EXEC_PREFIX curr

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-29 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2011.10.28 at 07:20 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2011.10.27 at 17:29 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > > > > > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > > > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > > > -fno-fat

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10/28/2011 10:33 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > >> By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree >> libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with >> -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > > I see that your patch doesn't de

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-28 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 28.10.11 01:35, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. It's a pretty big update as you can see by the following diffstat. I cannot

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-28 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2011.10.28 at 15:34 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > > What about the issues with libtool's notion of sysroots, as mentioned in > > > - have those > > > been resolved, and if so, how

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > What about the issues with libtool's notion of sysroots, as mentioned in > > - have those > > been resolved, and if so, how? And what about the directories only > > present in the src

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-28 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > >> By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree >> libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with >> -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > > I see that your patch doesn't deal with libgo/config, w

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-28 Thread Rainer Orth
Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. I see that your patch doesn't deal with libgo/config, where a private copy of libtool

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-27 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2011.10.28 at 00:41 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > > I

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-27 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2011.10.27 at 17:29 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > > > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > > It's a pretty big update

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-27 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > It's a pretty big update as you can see by the following diffstat.

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-27 Thread Andi Kleen
Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. > It's a pretty big update as you can see by the following diffstat. I > cannot attach

[RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate

2011-10-27 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. It's a pretty big update as you can see by the following diffstat. I cannot attach the patch even as a gzip file, because o