On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:48 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 May 2020, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > Attached patch adds missing vector zero/sign_extend expanders to allow
> > vectorization of operations between different vector sizes.
> >
> > The patch regresses (progresses?):
On Tue, 19 May 2020, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Attached patch adds missing vector zero/sign_extend expanders to allow
> vectorization of operations between different vector sizes.
>
> The patch regresses (progresses?):
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92645-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized
>
Hello!
Attached patch adds missing vector zero/sign_extend expanders to allow
vectorization of operations between different vector sizes.
The patch regresses (progresses?):
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92645-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized
"vec_unpack_lo" 3
but eyeballing the asm code before/afte
