Hi,
>> is it ok?
>
> Yes.
Checked into trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-04/msg00066.html
Thanks, K
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:24:06PM +0400, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> --- a/gcc/ChangeLog
> +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +2013-04-02 Alexander Ivchenko
> +
> + * config.gcc (arm*-*-linux-*): Remove duplicate t-linux-android.
> +
> 2013-04-02 Richard Biener
>
> PR tr
Yep.. we missed that:
t-linux-android was added here:
# Add Android userspace support to Linux targets.
case $target in
*linux*)
tm_p_file="${tm_p_file} linux-protos.h"
tmake_file="${tmake_file} t-linux-android"
tm_file="$tm_file linux-android.h"
extra_options="$ext
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:48PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> >
> > Otherwise OK.
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> Hi, chacked into trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-03/msg00785.html
This leads to:
../../gcc/config/t-linux-android:22: warning: overriding recipe for target
`linux-android.o'
../../
>
> Otherwise OK.
>
> Thanks,
Hi, chacked into trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-03/msg00785.html
Thanks, K
On 27/03/2013, at 4:14 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since almost three months have passed I feel that I need to recheck the patch
> before commiting it. I fixed what Maxim mentioned and also I fixed:
The patch is OK with 2 changes:
1. s/default_have_ifunc_p/default_has_ifunc_p/
The n
Hi,
Since almost three months have passed I feel that I need to recheck the patch
before commiting it. I fixed what Maxim mentioned and also I fixed:
diff --git a/gcc/configure b/gcc/configure
old mode 100755
new mode 100644
index eac96cd..928693a
--- a/gcc/configure
+++ b/gcc/configure
@@ -22055
On 15/01/2013, at 4:55 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> thank you very much for your review!
>
> I fixed the arm build and all other issues that you raised.
>
> the patch is attached. Bootstrap and tested on x86-64 linux
The patch is OK with the cleanups mentioned below (no need to resubmit for
thank you very much for your review!
I fixed the arm build and all other issues that you raised.
the patch is attached. Bootstrap and tested on x86-64 linux
Alexander
2013/1/11 Maxim Kuvyrkov :
> On 10/01/2013, at 12:24 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>
>>> Config/linux-android.h is a better plac
On 10/01/2013, at 12:24 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>> Config/linux-android.h is a better place for this declaration.
I was wrong here. Config/linux-android.h is not a "re-includable" header, and
is not fit for function declarations.
>
> That wouldn't help, I got the following error:
>
> I
Hello Maxim,
>>
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -29146,7 +29146,7 @@ make_name (tree decl, const char *suffix, bool
make_unique)
return global_var_name;
}
-#if defined (ASM_OUTPUT_TYPE_DIRECTIVE) && HAVE_GNU_INDIRECT_FUNCTION
On 29/12/2012, at 1:30 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Joseph, Maxim, thank you for your input. I converted this macro into
> a target hook as you said. I had to add gcc/config/linux-protos.h in order
> to declare linux (that works for android) version of this hook - otherwise
> I don't know where
Joseph, Maxim, thank you for your input. I converted this macro into
a target hook as you said. I had to add gcc/config/linux-protos.h in order
to declare linux (that works for android) version of this hook - otherwise
I don't know where to declare it..
>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
>> +++ b/gcc
On 27/12/2012, at 1:15 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently Android dynamic loader does not support indirect functions
> (And I don't think that
> it will someday). But there is no way for us to specify that for gcc,
> and for example, tests like
> gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-* are failing on
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> The attached patch is indended to add the target hook for indicating
> the support of ifunc on target.
That's not a hook, it's a target macro. What is the rationale for this
needing to be a target macro instead of a target hook?
--
Joseph S. My
Hi,
Currently Android dynamic loader does not support indirect functions
(And I don't think that
it will someday). But there is no way for us to specify that for gcc,
and for example, tests like
gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-* are failing on android right now.
The attached patch is indended to add the target
16 matches
Mail list logo
