On 01/27/15 07:27, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I've grepped for BUILT_IN_.*_CHKP in the sources and we actually need
far fewer enum values than the 1204 that are being defined.
This patch requires builtins.def to say explicitly (by using
DEF_*BUILTIN_CHKP macro instead of corresponding DEF_*BUILTI
On 01/28/15 12:24, Richard Biener wrote:
It should be the STABS and/or affected target maintainers job to get
this fixed
for them.
Richard,
Even if the STABS continuations are fixed, it requires fixing it in
previous releases of GCC, deploying the solution and achieving
adoption. The curren
On 01/28/15 12:57, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:51:24PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/28/15 12:24, Richard Biener wrote:
It should be the STABS and/or affected target maintainers job to get
this fixed
for them.
Richard,
Even if the STABS continuations are fixed, it requir
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:51:24PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/28/15 12:24, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>>It should be the STABS and/or affected target maintainers job to get
> >>this fixed
> >>>for them.
> >>
> >>Richard,
> >>
> >>Even if the STABS continuations are fixed, it requires fixing it in
On January 28, 2015 4:23:05 PM CET, David Edelsohn wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek
>wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Note, patch successfully bootstrapped/regtested
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> > Note, patch successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
>>> > i686-linux, and David said that on AIX
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > Note, patch successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
>> > i686-linux, and David said that on AIX it passed stage1 cc1 linking.
>> >
>> > Ok for trunk?
>>
>>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Note, patch successfully bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
> > i686-linux, and David said that on AIX it passed stage1 cc1 linking.
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
>
> Is the stabs issue meanwhile fixed at least on trunk?
AFAIK no
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:04:53PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> 2015-01-27 17:27 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> > I've grepped for BUILT_IN_.*_CHKP in the sources and we actually need
>> > far fewer enum values than the 1204 that are being d
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:04:53PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2015-01-27 17:27 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> > I've grepped for BUILT_IN_.*_CHKP in the sources and we actually need
> > far fewer enum values than the 1204 that are being defined.
> >
> > This patch requires builtins.def to say expli
2015-01-27 17:27 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> Hi!
>
> I've grepped for BUILT_IN_.*_CHKP in the sources and we actually need
> far fewer enum values than the 1204 that are being defined.
>
> This patch requires builtins.def to say explicitly (by using
> DEF_*BUILTIN_CHKP macro instead of correspondin
Hi!
I've grepped for BUILT_IN_.*_CHKP in the sources and we actually need
far fewer enum values than the 1204 that are being defined.
This patch requires builtins.def to say explicitly (by using
DEF_*BUILTIN_CHKP macro instead of corresponding DEF_*BUILTIN) which
ones need that, for all the other
12 matches
Mail list logo
