On 12/21/2011 04:44 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
If reordering works, let's just do that.
Sure. Then I'm going to apply the below when re-testing completes. Thanks!
Paolo.
///
/cp
2011-12-21 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/51305
* semantics.c (massage_constexpr_body): Reor
If reordering works, let's just do that.
Jason
Hi again,
Hi,
this is a rejects-valid with constexpr & noexcept, noticed by Daniel
(and myself time ago). I find it pretty annoying. Anyway, the issue
is, we reject:
constexpr bool ok() noexcept
{
typedef int type;
return true;
}
constexpr auto x = ok();
because of the noexcept. What h
Hi,
this is a rejects-valid with constexpr & noexcept, noticed by Daniel
(and myself time ago). I find it pretty annoying. Anyway, the issue is,
we reject:
constexpr bool ok() noexcept
{
typedef int type;
return true;
}
constexpr auto x = ok();
because of the noexcept. What happens is t
