Mike Stump wrote:
> While I had testing on my target, there were plenty of other regressions
> from trunk intermixed, so I wanted to do a normal bootstrap on Linux which
> I had not done yet. Kaz, you can check your patch, if the same, pretty
> sure it is, it has been approved and you can just ch
On Nov 28, 2014, at 4:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got odd ICEs with some bitmap operations when working on
>> sh-lra branch.
>> bitmap_ior and bitmap_ior_and_compl are the bitmap operations
>> for DST = A | B and DST = A |
Richard Biener wrote:
> Huh? Wasn't this fixed by Mike a few weeks ago?
Ugh. I've missed that thread. Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
kaz
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got odd ICEs with some bitmap operations when working on
> sh-lra branch.
> bitmap_ior and bitmap_ior_and_compl are the bitmap operations
> for DST = A | B and DST = A | (B & ~KILL) respectively. It
> looks they could make bitmaps
Hi,
I've got odd ICEs with some bitmap operations when working on
sh-lra branch.
bitmap_ior and bitmap_ior_and_compl are the bitmap operations
for DST = A | B and DST = A | (B & ~KILL) respectively. It
looks they could make bitmaps with the wrong "current" pointer.
One small example is
DST: [(bi
