On 09/22/16 20:07, Moritz Klammler wrote:
> Martin Sebor writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>> In-tree only the versions that download_prerequisite picks are
>>> tested and guaranteed to work.
>>
>> I was made aware today that my recent patch for pr49905 broke
>> bootstrap with MPFR 2.4:
>>
>>https://gcc.
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
> As some of you might already be aware of, I'm currently trying to get a
> new version of the `contrib/download_prerequisites` script approved that
> will verify the checksums of the tarballs it downloads and also provides
> additional options. If it i
On 09/22/16 20:00, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> There is no feasible way how to make all gmp/mpfr/mpc versions from
>> minimal to latest build for all targets and all possible
>> cross-configurations.
>>
>> I hope that we do not "recommend" these versions.
>
Martin Sebor writes:
> [...]
>
>> In-tree only the versions that download_prerequisite picks are
>> tested and guaranteed to work.
>
> I was made aware today that my recent patch for pr49905 broke
> bootstrap with MPFR 2.4:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01507.html
>
> In lig
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> There is no feasible way how to make all gmp/mpfr/mpc versions from
> minimal to latest build for all targets and all possible
> cross-configurations.
>
> I hope that we do not "recommend" these versions.
>
> They are only the minimum versions for pre
On September 22, 2016 8:00:40 PM GMT+02:00, Joseph Myers
wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> There is no feasible way how to make all gmp/mpfr/mpc versions from
>> minimal to latest build for all targets and all possible
>> cross-configurations.
>>
>> I hope that we do not "r
On 09/22/16 19:26, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 09:47 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, when they are pre-installed there should be no problem.
>> Also newer versions than these seem to work.
>>
>> In-tree only the versions that download_prerequisite picks are
>> tested and guaranteed
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Martin Sebor wrote:
> In light of this risk and given that the recommended MPFR version
> is still 2.4 I wonder if the download_prerequisites script shouldn't
> instead download the minimum supported version. That way those of
No, it should download the latest version known
On 04/27/2016 09:47 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Am 27.04.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Rainer Orth:
Bernd Edlinger writes:
On 26.04.2016 22:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
gmp/mpfr/mpc versio
On Tue, 3 May 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 28.04.2016 09:09, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > As said elsewhere the main reason for all of this is to make the
> > in-tree builds work better for newer archs that are not happy with
> > the versions provided by download_prerequesites. This should c
On 28.04.2016 09:09, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> As said elsewhere the main reason for all of this is to make the
> in-tree builds work better for newer archs that are not happy with
> the versions provided by download_prerequesites. This should come
> with a documentation adjustment that the only t
Hi Bernd,
>> would this version combo (gmp 6.0.0, mpfr 3.1.1, mpc 0.9) also work on
>> the active release branches (gcc-5 and gcc-6, gcc-4.9 is on it's way
>> out)? Having to install two different sets of the libraries for trunk
>> and branch work would be extremely tedious.
>>
>> Rainer
>>
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 26.04.2016 22:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
> >> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
> >
> > I think updating the minimum
Am 27.04.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Rainer Orth:
> Bernd Edlinger writes:
>
>> On 26.04.2016 22:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>
Hi,
as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
>>>
>>
Bernd Edlinger writes:
> On 26.04.2016 22:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
>>> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
>>
>> I think updating the minimum versions (when using previo
On 26.04.2016 22:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
>> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
>
> I think updating the minimum versions (when using previously built
> libraries, not in-tree
On 26.04.2016 21:28, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> For instance PR libstdc++/69881: gmp.h did this:
>>
>> #define __need_size_t /* tell gcc stddef.h we only want size_t */
>> #include /* for size_t */
>>
>> I've persuaded Jonathan to work around that in
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
I think updating the minimum versions (when using previously built
libraries, not in-tree) is only appropriate when it allows some cleanup i
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
For instance PR libstdc++/69881: gmp.h did this:
#define __need_size_t /* tell gcc stddef.h we only want size_t */
#include /* for size_t */
I've persuaded Jonathan to work around that in libstdc++.
Of course the in-tree build does work with le
On 26.04.2016 20:39, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
>> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
>>
>> So this attached patch is now targeting at only supporting the currently
>> latest relased gmp-6.1.0
On April 26, 2016 8:39:28 PM GMT+02:00, Marc Glisse
wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
>> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
>>
>> So this attached patch is now targeting at only supporting the
>currently
>> lat
On 26.04.2016 20:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:23:17PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
>> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
>
> I'm not saying we shouldn't bump the minimum supported versions, but bumping
> th
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
So this attached patch is now targeting at only supporting the currently
latest relased gmp-6.1.0, mpfr-3.1.4 and mpc-1.0.3, instead of trying
to suppor
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:23:17PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
> gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
I'm not saying we shouldn't bump the minimum supported versions, but bumping
them immediately to the latest releases is IMHO undes
Hi,
as we all know, it's high time now to adjust the minimum supported
gmp/mpfr/mpc versions for gcc-7.
So this attached patch is now targeting at only supporting the currently
latest relased gmp-6.1.0, mpfr-3.1.4 and mpc-1.0.3, instead of trying
to support all previous versions, especially in-tr
25 matches
Mail list logo
