> Having just looked at the opts.c and tree-ssa-live.c changes, they're fine.
Thanks, I've committed the patch.
-cary
>> Let me rebase the
>> patch, kick off a bootstrap and regression tests, and I think I can be
>> ready to submit it if there are no objections.
>
> Here's the rebased patch. I'm running the bootstrap and regression tests now.
The bootstrap passed with no new regressions. Do I need approval for
th
On 11/21/13 13:53, Cary Coutant wrote:
Let me rebase the
patch, kick off a bootstrap and regression tests, and I think I can be
ready to submit it if there are no objections.
Here's the rebased patch. I'm running the bootstrap and regression tests now.
The bootstrap passed with no new regress
On 11/20/13 16:48, Cary Coutant wrote:
Sorry, I never saw any feedback, positive or negative, on that, and it
kind of fell off my radar. I think it should still be ready to go in
-- Stage 1 is still open for another day, right? Let me rebase the
patch, kick off a bootstrap and regression tests, a
> Let me rebase the
> patch, kick off a bootstrap and regression tests, and I think I can be
> ready to submit it if there are no objections.
Here's the rebased patch. I'm running the bootstrap and regression tests now.
-cary
commit 2d50b3878cd8e96e31b92a5f1d261cbcea6ce0e5
Author: Cary Coutant
D
>> Sorry, I never saw any feedback, positive or negative, on that, and it
>> kind of fell off my radar. I think it should still be ready to go in
>> -- Stage 1 is still open for another day, right? Let me rebase the
>> patch, kick off a bootstrap and regression tests, and I think I can be
>> ready
On 11/20/13 16:30, Cary Coutant wrote:
Here, finally, is that patch again, reworked to generate line tables
at -g1. I plan to commit this when Stage 1 reopens, but I'd like to
verify that earlier consensus. I also plan to commit this to the
google/main branch, and future merges will go more smoot
>> Here, finally, is that patch again, reworked to generate line tables
>> at -g1. I plan to commit this when Stage 1 reopens, but I'd like to
>> verify that earlier consensus. I also plan to commit this to the
>> google/main branch, and future merges will go more smoothly if what I
>> put in googl
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Cary Coutant wrote:
> A long time ago, I proposed a -gmlt option to generate "minimal line
> tables" (basically -g1 + line tables):
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02075.html
>
> The consensus from that thread was that instead of a new option, we
>
A long time ago, I proposed a -gmlt option to generate "minimal line
tables" (basically -g1 + line tables):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02075.html
The consensus from that thread was that instead of a new option, we
should just modify -g1 to produce line tables (the documented pur
10 matches
Mail list logo
