Re: [RFC] Fix SRA with respect of BIT_FIELD_REF

2012-06-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Pinski >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> >  When I modified GCC to change the majority of bitfield accesses >> > which were done via compo

Re: [RFC] Fix SRA with respect of BIT_FIELD_REF

2012-06-02 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Pinski >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> >  When I modified GCC to change the majority of bitfield accesses >> > which were done via compo

Re: [RFC] Fix SRA with respect of BIT_FIELD_REF

2012-06-01 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Pinski > wrote: > > Hi, > >  When I modified GCC to change the majority of bitfield accesses > > which were done via component ref to BIT_FIELD_REF, SRA messes up > > because when it doe

Re: [RFC] Fix SRA with respect of BIT_FIELD_REF

2012-06-01 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Hi, >  When I modified GCC to change the majority of bitfield accesses > which were done via component ref to BIT_FIELD_REF, SRA messes up > because when it does the replacement it still tries to use the > BIT_FIELD_REF except it never places

[RFC] Fix SRA with respect of BIT_FIELD_REF

2012-05-31 Thread Andrew Pinski
Hi, When I modified GCC to change the majority of bitfield accesses which were done via component ref to BIT_FIELD_REF, SRA messes up because when it does the replacement it still tries to use the BIT_FIELD_REF except it never places the old value in the struct for the BIT_FIELD_REF to work corre