Hello,
it would be really nice if there can be reached an agreement here.
The bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
is open since 2008-12-27.
As a user I don't care if it is fixed in the middle or back end or where ever.
There are some duplicated bugs here, so this is not a
ugust 01, 2011 6:31 PM
> To: Jiangning Liu
> Cc: 'Joern Rennecke'; g...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> vmaka...@redhat.com; dje@gmail.com; Richard Henderson; Ramana
> Radhakrishnan; 'Ramana Radhakrishnan'
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add middle end hook for
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 06:14:27PM +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
> ARM. You are right, they were all fixed in back-ends in the past, but we
> should
> fix the bug in a general way to make GCC infrastructure stronger, rather
> than fixing the problem target-by-target and case-by-case! If you further
On 01/08/11 10:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:44:04AM +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
>> It's quite necessary to solve the general problem in middle-end rather than
>> in back-end.
>
> That's what we disagree on. All back-ends but ARM are able to handle it
> right, why can't A
com; dje@gmail.com; Richard Henderson; Ramana
> Radhakrishnan; 'Ramana Radhakrishnan'
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size
>
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:44:04AM +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
> > It's quite necessary to solve the general prob
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:44:04AM +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
> > It's quite necessary to solve the general problem in middle-end rather than
> > in back-end.
>
> That's what we disagree on. All back-ends but ARM are able to handle it
> right, why can
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:44:04AM +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
> It's quite necessary to solve the general problem in middle-end rather than
> in back-end.
That's what we disagree on. All back-ends but ARM are able to handle it
right, why can't ARM too? The ABI rules for stack handling in the e
.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org]
> On Behalf Of Joern Rennecke
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:33 AM
> To: Jiangning Liu
> Cc: g...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; vmaka...@redhat.com;
> dje@gmail.com; Richard Henderson; Ramana Radhakrishnan; 'Ramana
> Radhakrishn
Quoting Jiangning Liu :
Hi,
One month ago, I sent out this RFC to *gcc-patches* mail list, but I
didn't receive any response yet. So I'm forwarding this mail to
*gcc* mail list. Can anybody here really give feedback to me?
Well, I couldn't approve any patch, but I can point out some iss
om: Ramana Radhakrishnan [mailto:ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 6:18 PM
To: Jiangning Liu
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; vmaka...@redhat.com; dje@gmail.com; Richard
Henderson; Ramana Radhakrishnan
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size
2011/7/19 Jia
ches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org]
> On Behalf Of Jiangning Liu
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:32 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size
>
> PING...
>
> I just merged with
lp me?
Thanks,
-Jiangning
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Jiangning Liu
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:32 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rgue...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [RFC] Add middle end hook for stack red zone size
>
> This patch is to fix PR38644, which is a bug with long history about
> stack red zone access, and PR30282 is correlated.
>
> Originally red zone concept is not exposed to middle-end, and back-end
This patch is to fix PR38644, which is a bug with long history about stack
red zone access, and PR30282 is correlated.
Originally red zone concept is not exposed to middle-end, and back-end uses
special logic to add extra memory barrier RTL and help the correct
dependence in middle-end. This way d
14 matches
Mail list logo
