On 03/01/16 04:20, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Marcin Kościelnicki wrote:
The differences start in the __morestack calling convention. Basically,
since pushing things on stuck is unwieldy and there's only one free
register (%r0 could be used for static chain, %r2-
On 03/01/16 04:20, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Marcin Kościelnicki wrote:
The differences start in the __morestack calling convention. Basically,
since pushing things on stuck is unwieldy and there's only one free
register (%r0 could be used for static chain, %r2-
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Marcin Kościelnicki wrote:
>
> The differences start in the __morestack calling convention. Basically,
> since pushing things on stuck is unwieldy and there's only one free
> register (%r0 could be used for static chain, %r2-%r6 contain arguments,
> %r6-%r15 are c
Here's my attempt at adding -fsplit-stack support for s390 targets
(bug 68191). Patches 1 and 2 fix s390-specific issues affecting split
stack code, and can be pushed independently of the main course. Patches
3 and 4 attempt to fix target-independent issues involving unconditional
jumps with side
