On 03/30/2017 05:50 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> I have finally completed all tests for Cygwin and MinGW both 32- &
> 64-bit with no additional test failures. There are still 567 tests
> failing both pre- and post-patch with error "error while loading shared
> libraries: cyggfortran-4.dll: cannot op
I have finally completed all tests for Cygwin and MinGW both 32- &
64-bit with no additional test failures. There are still 567 tests
failing both pre- and post-patch with error "error while loading shared
libraries: cyggfortran-4.dll: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory"
Uros,
Testing on Cygwin only turns out to be a nightmare, but I've finally
gotten some test results that I'm calling "clean enough". I have only
done 64-bit Cygwin thus far, (still need 32-bit Cygwin as well as 32/64
MinGW), but I've hit a snag. The first patch set ("Use aligned SSE movs
for
It's been a while and I wanted to post a status update. My new tests
needed a few fix-ups to work on Cygwin, but they pass.
As for the rest, it turns out that running the testsuite on Cygwin is a
vertable nightmare. The tests are NOT even correct because they load
the shared libs (dlls) that
On 02/10/2017 06:20 PM, JonY wrote:
On 02/10/2017 05:23 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
On 02/10/2017 05:34 AM, JonY wrote:
Hi,
mingw-w64 itself does not use any ms_abi/sysv_abi marked functions
internally, so it should be unaffected. I don't think Cygwin uses any
either, but I need to double check.
On 02/10/2017 05:23 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> On 02/10/2017 05:34 AM, JonY wrote:
>> Hi,
>> mingw-w64 itself does not use any ms_abi/sysv_abi marked functions
>> internally, so it should be unaffected. I don't think Cygwin uses any
>> either, but I need to double check.
>
> Of course, ms_abi is g
On 02/10/2017 04:32 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
You will need a sign-off from cygwin od mingw-w64 maintainer (CC'd).
While I can review the patch in the sense that it won't break generic
code, I don't know nothing about mingw-64 to give you any me
On 02/10/2017 05:34 AM, JonY wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the code size reduction patch, I have a few questions:
Thanks for your review!
1. How does code compiled with -moutline-msabi-xlogues interact with
older code compiled without it? Are these only called on ABI transition?
These are only cal
On 02/10/2017 10:32 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
>
>> Uros or Jan,
>> Please take this as a ping, as I never bothered pinging after submitting v2
>> since I found a few more issues with it. :) Although I realize this would be
>> a GCC 8 stage 1 ite
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Uros or Jan,
> Please take this as a ping, as I never bothered pinging after submitting v2
> since I found a few more issues with it. :) Although I realize this would be
> a GCC 8 stage 1 item, I would like to try to get it finished up and
>
I apologize to those of you who get this twice, but I accidentally
posted to the wrong list!
Uros or Jan,
Please take this as a ping, as I never bothered pinging after submitting
v2 since I found a few more issues with it. :) Although I realize this
would be a GCC 8 stage 1 item, I would like
11 matches
Mail list logo
