Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Enable zero/sign extension elimination

2015-04-22 Thread Kugan
On 23/04/15 09:48, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Kugan > wrote: >> On 17/01/15 13:11, Kugan wrote: >>> >>> Re-enable zero/sign extension elimination using value range that >>> includes wrapped attribute. >>> >> >> Now that stage-1 is open, rebased it and regression tested on

Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Enable zero/sign extension elimination

2015-04-22 Thread H.J. Lu
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Kugan wrote: > On 17/01/15 13:11, Kugan wrote: >> >> Re-enable zero/sign extension elimination using value range that >> includes wrapped attribute. >> > > Now that stage-1 is open, rebased it and regression tested on > x86-64-none-linux-gnu with no new regressions

Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Enable zero/sign extension elimination

2015-04-22 Thread Kugan
On 17/01/15 13:11, Kugan wrote: > > Re-enable zero/sign extension elimination using value range that > includes wrapped attribute. > Now that stage-1 is open, rebased it and regression tested on x86-64-none-linux-gnu with no new regressions. Is this OK for trunk? Thanks, Kugan gcc/ChangeLog:

[RFC][PATCH 3/3] Enable zero/sign extension elimination

2015-01-16 Thread Kugan
Re-enable zero/sign extension elimination using value range that includes wrapped attribute. Thanks, Kugan gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-01-16 Kugan Vivekanandarajah * calls.c (precompute_arguments): Check promoted_for_signed_and_unsigned_p and set the promoted mode. * expr.