On 09/03/17 14:42, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently we've put a lot of effort into improving ifcvt to use CSEL on
> AArch64.
> In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01639.html James determined
> the best value for AArch64 code generation. Although this setting is used
> when
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:37 AM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
> I'd like to hear comments from the Exynos-M1, Falkor and
> xgene-1 subtarget contributors, particularly as these targets use
> generic_branch_costs for their subtarget-sepcific tuning. It may be that
> your patch needs to preserve the 2,2
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:06:16PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently we've put a lot of effort into improving ifcvt to use CSEL on
> > AArch64. In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01639.html
> > James determi
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently we've put a lot of effort into improving ifcvt to use CSEL on
> AArch64.
> In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01639.html James determined
> the best value for AArch64 code generation. Although this setting is
Hi,
Recently we've put a lot of effort into improving ifcvt to use CSEL on AArch64.
In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01639.html James determined
the best value for AArch64 code generation. Although this setting is used when
explicitly targeting Cortex cores, it is not otherwise u
