On 09/12/2019 15:59, Richard Sandiford wrote:
No, the assumption's correct even there. The assert usually triggers
because something elsewhere is getting confused about the vector types.
The attached patch fixes the ICE in the testcase, but I suspect does not
go far enough. Can it happen that
Andrew Stubbs writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes an ICE in testcase gcc.dg/vect/vect-ctor-1.c:
>
> during GIMPLE pass: vect
> dump file: vect-ctor-1.c.159t.vect
> .../gcc.dg/vect/vect-ctor-1.c: In function 'intrapred_luma_16x16':
> .../gcc.dg/vect/vect-ctor-1.c:9:6: internal compiler error: in
>
Hi,
This patch fixes an ICE in testcase gcc.dg/vect/vect-ctor-1.c:
during GIMPLE pass: vect
dump file: vect-ctor-1.c.159t.vect
.../gcc.dg/vect/vect-ctor-1.c: In function 'intrapred_luma_16x16':
.../gcc.dg/vect/vect-ctor-1.c:9:6: internal compiler error: in
exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162
0xdf845f
