Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-03-01 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > Here's an updated version, plus some updates to install.texi to avoid > references to the obsolete ports. > > OK? OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-29 Thread Pedro Alves
On 02/28/2012 05:10 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> Here's an updated patch and a suggested web-page patch: > > uClinux targets do not have -gnu in their target triplets. > > You missed the WinCE port from the list in the webpage patch of ports > b

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-29 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 28/02/12 23:42, John Tytgat wrote: > In message <4f4d0e64.1020...@arm.com> > Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> On 28/02/12 17:10, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>> Here's an updated patch and a suggested web-page patch: >>> >>> uClinux target

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread John Tytgat
In message <4f4d0e64.1020...@arm.com> Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 28/02/12 17:10, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > >> Here's an updated patch and a suggested web-page patch: > > > > uClinux targets do not have -gnu in their target triplets

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 28/02/12 17:10, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> Here's an updated patch and a suggested web-page patch: > > uClinux targets do not have -gnu in their target triplets. > > You missed the WinCE port from the list in the webpage patch of ports > being

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > Here's an updated patch and a suggested web-page patch: uClinux targets do not have -gnu in their target triplets. You missed the WinCE port from the list in the webpage patch of ports being deprecated for using FPA floating-point format and lackin

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 28/02/12 15:51, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 28/02/12 15:38, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> >>> So how about we just deprecate all targets that are still using FPE format? >> >> This patch appears to add back the i[34567]86-*-interix3* deprecation - >

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 28/02/12 15:38, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> So how about we just deprecate all targets that are still using FPE format? > > This patch appears to add back the i[34567]86-*-interix3* deprecation - Oops, botched merge conflict. > removed delibera

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > So how about we just deprecate all targets that are still using FPE format? This patch appears to add back the i[34567]86-*-interix3* deprecation - removed deliberately when the target got a maintainer - and arm-wrs-vxworks is *not* using FPE forma

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 16/12/11 18:53, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> I think we've reached the point where the following target >> configurations should be End-of-Life'd. As such, I'd like to mark them >> as deprecated in gcc-4.7, prior to removal after the branch. > > I

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2012-02-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
Richard, are you going to check in these deprecations for 4.7 (with the additional deprecation of old-ABI uClinux as I noted in )? Time is rapidly running out for doing so. Note that current glibc ports no longer supports ARM old-ABI; I

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2011-12-16 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > I think we've reached the point where the following target > configurations should be End-of-Life'd. As such, I'd like to mark them > as deprecated in gcc-4.7, prior to removal after the branch. I agree it's time to remove these old-ABI ports - and o

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2011-12-09 Thread John Tytgat
In message <4ee2285b.3060...@arm.com> Richard Earnshaw wrote: > I think we've reached the point where the following target > configurations should be End-of-Life'd. As such, I'd like to mark them > as deprecated in gcc-4.7, prior to removal after the branch. > > I'd also like to remov

Re: [RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2011-12-09 Thread Rainer Orth
Richard Earnshaw writes: > --- config.gcc(revision 182097) > +++ config.gcc(local) > @@ -242,7 +242,14 @@ md_file= > > # Obsolete configurations. > case ${target} in > + # Avoid special cases that are not obsolete > + arm*-*-linux-gnueabi* \ > + | arm*-*-ecos-elf

[RFC, PATCH] ARM related deprecations

2011-12-09 Thread Richard Earnshaw
I think we've reached the point where the following target configurations should be End-of-Life'd. As such, I'd like to mark them as deprecated in gcc-4.7, prior to removal after the branch. I'd also like to remove at that time support for some now obsolete co-processor units, namely the FPA and