Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> How about:
>
> On ARM, a bug has been fixed in GCC's implementation of the AAPCS
> rules for the layout of vectors that could lead to wrong code being
> generated. Vectors larger than 8 bytes in size are now by default
> aligned to an 8-byte boundary. This is an ABI ch
On 10/08/12 16:18, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 10/08/12 14:44, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>>> Would the following htdocs patch be OK with you? Feel free to suggest
>>> a more appropriate wording ...
>>
>> I think we need to make it clear that this also fixes a bug in the
>>
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 10/08/12 14:44, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Would the following htdocs patch be OK with you? Feel free to suggest
> > a more appropriate wording ...
>
> I think we need to make it clear that this also fixes a bug in the
> compiler that could lead to a run-time error.
On 10/08/12 14:44, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> In addition I'd like this documented in changes.html for each of the
>> release branches.
>
> Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> However, it does need to be release-noted.
>
> Would the following htdocs patch be OK with you?
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> In addition I'd like this documented in changes.html for each of the
> release branches.
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> However, it does need to be release-noted.
Would the following htdocs patch be OK with you? Feel free to suggest
a more appropriate wording ...
B
