[PING] Re: [RFA 1/n] Fix if conversion interactions with block partitioning

2012-10-09 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
PING. On 24 September 2012 11:34, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > On Wednesday 05 September 2012 13:47:19 Steven Bosscher wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: >> > + /* If the two blocks are in different partitions we do not want to mark >> > + this as a fallth

Re: [RFA 1/n] Fix if conversion interactions with block partitioning

2012-09-24 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 13:47:19 Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > > + /* If the two blocks are in different partitions we do not want to mark > > + this as a fallthru edge. */ > > + if (BB_PARTITION (b) != BB_PARTITION (c)) > > +

Re: [RFA 1/n] Fix if conversion interactions with block partitioning

2012-09-05 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > + /* If the two blocks are in different partitions we do not want to mark > + this as a fallthru edge. */ > + if (BB_PARTITION (b) != BB_PARTITION (c)) > +return; > + I think you should look for a REG_CROSSING_JUMP note on

[RFA 1/n] Fix if conversion interactions with block partitioning

2012-09-05 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
All, This is the first patch in a series with the ultimate aim of enabling -freorder-blocks-and-partition in the ARM backend. However, whilst working on this I have come across a number of midend issues which should be fixed individually. This patch fixes an ICE during if-conversion. The probl