On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 00:39, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> csky fails to build libgcc after the c23 changes because it has a
> typedef for bool. AFAICT it's internal to the file, so removing the
> typedef isn't an ABI change.
>
> Similiarly for c6x which includes unwind-arm-common.inc. I suspect
> most
On 17/11/2024 23:38, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> csky fails to build libgcc after the c23 changes because it has a typedef for
> bool. AFAICT it's internal to the file, so removing the typedef isn't an ABI
> change.
>
> Similiarly for c6x which includes unwind-arm-common.inc. I suspect most, if
> no
csky fails to build libgcc after the c23 changes because it has a
typedef for bool. AFAICT it's internal to the file, so removing the
typedef isn't an ABI change.
Similiarly for c6x which includes unwind-arm-common.inc. I suspect
most, if not all of the arm-v7 and older targets are failing
