Re: [RFA][PR tree-optimization/79095][PATCH 4/4] Tests

2017-02-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > > This is unchanged from the original posting. Reposting to make review > easier. > > > The tests in g++.dg start with a reduced test from Martin (pr79095-1.C) that > includes a size check. With the size != 0 check this testcase should not > issu

[RFA][PR tree-optimization/79095][PATCH 4/4] Tests

2017-02-07 Thread Jeff Law
This is unchanged from the original posting. Reposting to make review easier. The tests in g++.dg start with a reduced test from Martin (pr79095-1.C) that includes a size check. With the size != 0 check this testcase should not issue any warnings as the path that turns into a __builtin_m

[RFA][PR tree-optimization/79095][PATCH 4/4] Tests

2017-02-04 Thread Jeff Law
These are the tests. The tests in g++.dg start with a reduced test from Martin (pr79095-1.C) that includes a size check. With the size != 0 check this testcase should not issue any warnings as the path that turns into a __builtin_memset should get eliminated. pr79095-2.C is the same test,