Re: [RFA][PATCH] Fix mips16 codegen issue in a better way

2017-04-18 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/18/2017 05:16 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Jeff Law writes: [RFA is for the regcprop bits, reverting the mips.md hack seems like a no-brainer with the regcprop change. ] Per the recent discussion between Richard S. and myself, this is a better fix for the mips16 codegen issue where it's

Re: [RFA][PATCH] Fix mips16 codegen issue in a better way

2017-04-18 Thread Richard Sandiford
Jeff Law writes: > [RFA is for the regcprop bits, reverting the mips.md hack seems like a > no-brainer with the regcprop change. ] > > > Per the recent discussion between Richard S. and myself, this is a > better fix for the mips16 codegen issue where it's creating invalid lwu > insns. > > As R

[RFA][PATCH] Fix mips16 codegen issue in a better way

2017-04-17 Thread Jeff Law
[RFA is for the regcprop bits, reverting the mips.md hack seems like a no-brainer with the regcprop change. ] Per the recent discussion between Richard S. and myself, this is a better fix for the mips16 codegen issue where it's creating invalid lwu insns. As Richard S. pointed out there's