On 01/07/14 01:08, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Tuesday, January 7, 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/24/13 13:19, Steven Bosscher wrote:
For GCC 4.10
we should define what behavior should result from
builtin_unreachable
(Should it trap? Can it be optimized away afte
On 12/24/13 13:19, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
So here's an alternate approach to fixing 59285. I still think attacking
this in rtl_merge_blocks is better, but with nobody else chiming in to break
the deadlock Steven and myself are in, I'll go with S
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> So here's an alternate approach to fixing 59285. I still think attacking
> this in rtl_merge_blocks is better, but with nobody else chiming in to break
> the deadlock Steven and myself are in, I'll go with Steven's preferred
> solution (fix the
So here's an alternate approach to fixing 59285. I still think
attacking this in rtl_merge_blocks is better, but with nobody else
chiming in to break the deadlock Steven and myself are in, I'll go with
Steven's preferred solution (fix the callers in ifcvt.c).
If we were to return to a "fix
