Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-12-21 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
On 17 December 2012 14:28, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 21/11/12 11:48, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: >> >> On 21 November 2012 00:05, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> >>> >>> looks fine, except one missing chunk from my original patch. maybe left >>> out >>> intentionally. >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> Ind

Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-12-17 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 21/11/12 11:48, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: On 21 November 2012 00:05, Matthias Klose wrote: looks fine, except one missing chunk from my original patch. maybe left out intentionally. Matthias Index: b/src/gcc/config.gcc =

Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-12-17 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 20/11/12 20:34, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: All, This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7. The backport was not clean as 4.8 has obsoleted various arm*-*-* triplets which are valid in 4.7. I have tested this cross with arm-none-

Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-12-07 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
PING^2 On 29 November 2012 14:45, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > PING > > On 20 November 2012 20:34, Matthew Gretton-Dann > wrote: >> All, >> >> This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet >> support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7. >> >> The backport was not clean as 4.8 has

Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-11-29 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
PING On 20 November 2012 20:34, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > All, > > This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet > support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7. > > The backport was not clean as 4.8 has obsoleted various arm*-*-* > triplets which are valid in 4.7. > > I have test

Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-11-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > All, > > This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet > support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7. > > The backport was not clean as 4.8 has obsoleted various arm*-*-* > triplets which are valid in 4.7. > > I have tested this c

Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-11-21 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
On 21 November 2012 00:05, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 20.11.2012 21:34, schrieb Matthew Gretton-Dann: >> All, >> >> This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet >> support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7. >> >> The backport was not clean as 4.8 has obsoleted various arm*-*-* >>

Re: [RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-11-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 20.11.2012 21:34, schrieb Matthew Gretton-Dann: > All, > > This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet > support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7. > > The backport was not clean as 4.8 has obsoleted various arm*-*-* > triplets which are valid in 4.7. > > I have tested this

[RFA/4.7/ARM] Backport arm-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support to 4.7

2012-11-20 Thread Matthew Gretton-Dann
All, This patch backports Matthais Klose's arm*-*-linux-gnueabihf triplet support patch of 2012-10-15 to 4.7. The backport was not clean as 4.8 has obsoleted various arm*-*-* triplets which are valid in 4.7. I have tested this cross with arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and arm-none-linux-gnueabi. One