Re: [Ping^2][PATCH][GCC-5] Fix "#pragma GCC pop_options" warning.

2016-03-03 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
On 03/03/16 12:11, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 03/03/2016 11:45 AM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >> On 29/02/16 10:47, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>> On 15/02/16 10:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: On 18/01/16 11:04, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > Hi there, > > Can we have the "#pragma

Re: [Ping^2][PATCH][GCC-5] Fix "#pragma GCC pop_options" warning.

2016-03-03 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 03/03/2016 11:45 AM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: On 29/02/16 10:47, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: On 15/02/16 10:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: On 18/01/16 11:04, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: Hi there, Can we have the "#pragma GCC pop_options" fix backported to GCC-5? Patch found in https:/

Re: [Ping^2][PATCH][GCC-5] Fix "#pragma GCC pop_options" warning.

2016-03-03 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
On 29/02/16 10:47, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > On 15/02/16 10:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >> On 18/01/16 11:04, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> Can we have the "#pragma GCC pop_options" fix backported to GCC-5? >>> >>> Patch found in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-1

Re: [Ping^2][PATCH][GCC-5] Fix "#pragma GCC pop_options" warning.

2016-02-29 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
On 15/02/16 10:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: On 18/01/16 11:04, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: Hi there, Can we have the "#pragma GCC pop_options" fix backported to GCC-5? Patch found in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01261.html and was committed in r228794. The same patch appli