Hi Paul,
thanks for the review. Submitted as r224827.
Regards,
Andre
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_18.f08
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_18.f08 (Re
Dear Andre,
It was indeed the associate(pam => im(:, c)) that I had in mind. If
you have that working and in the tescase, that's good enough for me.
Cheers
Paul
On 22 June 2015 at 17:15, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:04:09 +0200
> Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:04:09 +0200
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Some questions: The first and second chunks look a bit awkward in
> parse.c. Do they have to be there in order that primary.c does the
> right thing?
I tried at first to do this rank resolution in primary.c,
Hi Andre,
Some questions: The first and second chunks look a bit awkward in
parse.c. Do they have to be there in order that primary.c does the
right thing? Could the whole lot be transferred to resolve.c or would
that make it horribly messy? I couldn't apply the patch right now -
does it work with
Hi all,
a ping on this patch. Rebased to current trunk.
Bootstraps and regtests fine on x86_64-linux-gnu/f21.
Ok for trunk?
- Andre
> On Mon, 4 May 2015 16:53:15 +0200
> Andre Vehreschild wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I like to present here a first patch for using class arrays in associate.
