2011/7/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
> Denis Chertykov wrote:
>> I have asked about example of *d instead of !d.
>> Just svn GCC with *d vs svn GCC !d.
>>
>> Denis.
>
> Is the patch ok with the original !d instead of *d ?
Ok.
Denis.
Denis Chertykov wrote:
> I have asked about example of *d instead of !d.
> Just svn GCC with *d vs svn GCC !d.
>
> Denis.
Is the patch ok with the original !d instead of *d ?
It still improves and the !d vs. *d don't matter because there's
always r I think.
Johann
Denis Chertykov wrote:
> 2011/7/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
>> Denis Chertykov wrote:
>>> 2011/7/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
For loading a 32-bit constant in a register, there is room for
improvement:
* SF can be handled the same way as SI and therefore the patch
adds a peep2 to produce
2011/7/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
> Denis Chertykov wrote:
>> 2011/7/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
>>> For loading a 32-bit constant in a register, there is room for
>>> improvement:
>>>
>>> * SF can be handled the same way as SI and therefore the patch
>>> adds a peep2 to produce a *reload_insf analogon to *rel
Denis Chertykov wrote:
> 2011/7/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
>> For loading a 32-bit constant in a register, there is room for
>> improvement:
>>
>> * SF can be handled the same way as SI and therefore the patch
>> adds a peep2 to produce a *reload_insf analogon to *reload_insi.
>>
>> * If the destination
2011/7/6 Georg-Johann Lay :
> For loading a 32-bit constant in a register, there is room for
> improvement:
>
> * SF can be handled the same way as SI and therefore the patch
> adds a peep2 to produce a *reload_insf analogon to *reload_insi.
>
> * If the destination register overlaps NO_LD_REGS, v
For loading a 32-bit constant in a register, there is room for
improvement:
* SF can be handled the same way as SI and therefore the patch
adds a peep2 to produce a *reload_insf analogon to *reload_insi.
* If the destination register overlaps NO_LD_REGS, values already
loaded into some other
