Re: [Patch testsuite] Fix vec_interleave and vec_extract_even_odd to fall back to vec_perm

2012-01-23 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 23 January 2012 09:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:30:46AM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> Now that we have vec_perm support, vec_interleave and >> vec_extract_even_odd should fall out from that rather than having to >> handle an additional target in each of these. T

Re: [Patch testsuite] Fix vec_interleave and vec_extract_even_odd to fall back to vec_perm

2012-01-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:30:46AM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > Now that we have vec_perm support, vec_interleave and > vec_extract_even_odd should fall out from that rather than having to > handle an additional target in each of these. This fixes > gcc.dg/vect/slp-11a.c for ARM Neon testin

[Patch testsuite] Fix vec_interleave and vec_extract_even_odd to fall back to vec_perm

2012-01-23 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
Hi, Now that we have vec_perm support, vec_interleave and vec_extract_even_odd should fall out from that rather than having to handle an additional target in each of these. This fixes gcc.dg/vect/slp-11a.c for ARM Neon testing with no other regressions in gcc.dg/vect Ok ? cheers Ramana 2012-0